Stakeholder Engagement Guide¶
For the Implementation of Commitment Pooling in New Communities
🌱 Introduction¶
Commitment Pooling offers communities a metabolic system of trust, where promises—not money—form the fabric of economic coordination. Unlike extractive models of aid, it relies on community-owned records of contributions, redemptions, and mutual care. In implementing Commitment Pools, it is essential to engage stakeholders continuously—not just at inception, but throughout the evolution of the pool.
This guide outlines best practices for implementers to build long-term, trust-based relationships with community members and local institutions. Stakeholder engagement is not a box-ticking exercise; it is how pools grow, are protected, and are eventually owned by the communities themselves.
🧩 Key Points in Stakeholder Engagement¶
🤝 Build Rapport Early¶
Relationship building takes time. Begin with informal visits alongside local leaders. Be clear this is about community autonomy and shared trust—not charity or external control.
Early engagement allows for co-design and preempts misunderstandings. Trust grows before a pool is seeded.
🎯 Begin With the End in Mind¶
The goal of Commitment Pooling is community autonomy. Design your engagement with an exit strategy. Ensure community members are supported to run, govern, and sustain pools themselves—without dependency on the implementing organization.
🛠 Community-Owned Programming¶
Every community has a living history of reciprocity: labor sharing, social funds, care networks. Pools should amplify, not overwrite, these. Embed local elders, cooperatives, and care groups in every step—from voucher design to governance and redemption protocols.
📌 Part One: Principles of Stakeholder Engagement¶
Who Are Stakeholders?¶
In a Commitment Pooling context, stakeholders include:
- Local community members and their associations
- Women and youth groups
- Elders, teachers, caregivers
- Local religious and cultural leaders
- Government officials
- Civil society and cooperatives
- Vulnerable households and marginalized groups
Eight Core Engagement Functions¶
-
Stakeholder Identification & Trust Mapping
Identify trust anchors—those whose word holds weight. Map relationships that already route care. -
Accessible Information Sharing
Use local language and metaphors: "Your promise is enough", "trust flows", "memory of contribution". Explain pools as shared ledgers of care. -
Reciprocal Consultation
Let design emerge from community logic. What promises feel trustworthy? What commitments are redeemable? -
Trust-Based Negotiation
Align pool parameters (credit limits, time bounds, fees) through inclusive discussion. Use story circles or village forums. -
Open Grievance Pathways
Use local conflict mediators. Empower elders and mutual aid groups to guide redemption conflicts or delayed fulfillment. -
Participatory Monitoring
Let users review pool flows regularly. Who is fulfilling? What trust patterns are emerging? Feedback loops keep pools living. -
Transparent Reporting
Regularly share snapshots of the pool: fulfilled commitments, trust balances, emergent needs. -
Ongoing Relationship Stewardship
Ensure implementing agents are accountable to the community. Train local stewards and recorders.
📘 Part Two: Phases and Practices¶
📐 Design Phase¶
- Co-design voucher types and fulfillment protocols with local groups
- Identify vulnerable households and their care needs
- Use storytelling and games to explain commitment pooling
🔎 Feasibility & Trust Readiness¶
- Assess trust dynamics and redemption capacity
- Document local networks of reciprocity
- Pilot trust circles with small swaps and redemptions
🔄 Operationalization¶
- Support creation of Pool Agreements and limits
- Train stewards in memory recording (digital or paper)
- Align pool data with local seasonal cycles and labor patterns
🛡 Sustainability¶
- Transition to community governance
- Develop local fallback protocols for unresolved redemptions
- Create shared social funds for emergency trust repair
🧠 Example Stakeholder List¶
To launch a Commitment Pool, engage:
- Elders and respected care providers
- Religious and spiritual leaders
- Chamas, co-ops, self-help groups
- Teachers, healers, and caregivers
- Local chiefs and DCCs
- Area MPs and county officials
- Civil society, youth, and women leaders
- Local business owners and vendors
- Community-based organizations
- Other humanitarian actors
Always approach with humility: “We’re here to remember a practice with you—not to replace what already works.”
📨 Sample Letter (Commitment Pool Version)¶
From: [Implementing Organization]
To: Local Government Representative
Location
Date
Subject: Engagement on Commitment Pooling with Local Communities
Dear [Title/Name],
With the support of community groups, elders, and local organizations, we are assisting in the establishment of Commitment Pools—shared registries of promises that support mutual care and local livelihoods.
Commitment Pools are not about money, but about tracking who contributes, fulfills, and receives. They strengthen existing forms of trust—such as labor sharing, community lending, or informal barter.
We request your permission to introduce this community-led coordination tool. Our goal is not to lead, but to support communities to self-organize using a trust-based model.
We look forward to your guidance and support.
Warm regards,
[Name]
[Title]
[Implementing Organization]